A state legal professional desires to vacate the conviction of “Serial” podcast topic Adnan Syed and retry the case.
The information was first reported by the Wall Avenue Journal.
Syed’s conviction for the 1999 homicide of Hae Min Lee in Baltimore grew to become a nationwide obsession within the first season of Sarah Koenig’s podcast “Serial” in 2014. He was convicted of strangling Lee in 2000 and has been serving a life sentence. Regardless of numerous appeals, he’s remained behind bars since.
After a yearlong investigation performed by the state’s legal professional for Baltimore Metropolis and Syed’s attorneys, a brand new trial is being requested after new proof was discovered, together with some that factors to 2 suspects who had been by no means correctly dominated out who might have been concerned collectively.
One of many suspects allegedly threatened to kill Lee, however that data was by no means given to the protection. Lee’s physique was additionally present in rather a lot behind a home owned by one of many suspect’s relative. That data was additionally not supplied to Syed’s authorized crew.
Because it occurs
Get updates on the coronavirus pandemic and different information because it occurs with our free breaking information e mail alerts.
Additional, after Syed’s conviction, one of many suspects assaulted a girl in her automotive “with out provocation or excuse” and the opposite was convicted of rape and sexual assault.
No public details about the suspects has been launched as a result of the investigation is ongoing.
“The State not has confidence within the integrity of the conviction,” the workplace of Baltimore State’s Lawyer Marilyn Mosby informed the Journal.
Furthermore, the state’s legal professional requested that Syed be launched on his personal recognizance because the investigation is ongoing.
“However after reviewing the proof and the brand new details about different suspects, it’s our obligation to make sure that justice is finished,” Mosby mentioned. “We imagine that maintaining him detained as we proceed to research the case with every part that we all know now, and once we do not need confidence in outcomes of the primary trial, can be unjust.”
Syed has been near getting a brand new trial earlier than. In 2018, a particular appeals court docket known as for a brand new trial however their resolution was reversed a yr later by the state Courtroom of Appeals, Maryland’s supreme court docket equal.
Earlier this yr, Syed’s attorneys requested the Baltimore’s Sentencing Review Unit to overview the case in opposition to their consumer.