Image default

Unhealthy Candidates Matter

John Ellis: “Anyway, dangerous candidates matter is a featured piece of the mainstream media’s political protection up to now this 12 months. And naturally it’s true; dangerous candidates do matter. What’s odd in regards to the mainstream media’s ‘dangerous candidates matter’ narrative is that each one the dangerous candidates are Republicans.”

“Take Pennsylvania. There, Republican main voters had a selection between Dr. Oz (endorsed by Trump) and former Bridgewater CEO David McCormick. They selected Oz (by a whisker). There’s little question that Ouncesis a second- or third-string politician. There’s little question that McCormick would have been a a lot, a lot stronger basic election candidate. However the worst candidate within the Senate race in Pennsylvania is just not Dr. Oz. The worst candidate within the race is the Democratic Occasion’s nominee: Lt. Governor John Fetterman.”

“To be honest, the first motive Mr. Fetterman is the worst Senate candidate in Pennsylvania this time round has nothing to do together with his political abilities. Shortly earlier than profitable the Democratic main again in Might, Fetterman suffered a stroke. It was not a ‘minor’ stroke or sequence of TIAs. It was a stroke stroke. It has had a discernible impression on his skill to talk and suppose coherently. It has saved him off the marketing campaign path for months. It has required his marketing campaign operatives to insist on basic election debate ‘circumstances’ that no affordable particular person would take into account acceptable. It has left his marketing campaign with the next message; ‘He’ll be high-quality, ultimately.’”

LoadingSave to Favorites

Related posts

Lookout, GOP: Biden Getting Highest Approval Score In A Yr


Roger Stone Urged Violence Simply Earlier than the Election


Fetterman’s Stroke Restoration Could Complicate Debates